Sekundärliteratur:Markus: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Die Offene Bibel

Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
Zeile 61: Zeile 61:
  
 
* Lohmeyer, Ernst (1951): [http://digi20.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/fontsize.3/object/display/bsb00051832_00001.html?prox=true&phone=true&start=50&ngram=true&hl=scan&fulltext=Das+Evangelium+nach&rows=10&mode=simple&context=Das%20Evangelium%20nach Das Evangelium des Markus] (KEKNT), Göttingen 1951
 
* Lohmeyer, Ernst (1951): [http://digi20.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/fontsize.3/object/display/bsb00051832_00001.html?prox=true&phone=true&start=50&ngram=true&hl=scan&fulltext=Das+Evangelium+nach&rows=10&mode=simple&context=Das%20Evangelium%20nach Das Evangelium des Markus] (KEKNT), Göttingen 1951
 
* Lührmann, Dieter: Das Markusevangelium (HNT), Tübingen 1987
 
  
 
* Marcus, Joel (2000/2009): [http://www.biblicalwritings.com/category/the-anchor-yale-bible-commentary/mark-introduction-translation-and-notes/ Mark 1-8 (Bd. 1), 8-16 (Bd. 2): A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary] (AB), New Haven. Der Kommentar steht hier offenbar vollständig in Form von einzelnen Blogs. Rechtslage ungeklärt.
 
* Marcus, Joel (2000/2009): [http://www.biblicalwritings.com/category/the-anchor-yale-bible-commentary/mark-introduction-translation-and-notes/ Mark 1-8 (Bd. 1), 8-16 (Bd. 2): A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary] (AB), New Haven. Der Kommentar steht hier offenbar vollständig in Form von einzelnen Blogs. Rechtslage ungeklärt.

Version vom 22. März 2014, 14:33 Uhr

S.a. die Sammlung bei Open-Access-Werken zu Markus auf Biblicalstudies.org.uk und lastseminary.com

Bibliographien[Bearbeiten]

Textkritik[Bearbeiten]

Zum Markusschluss s. Sekundärliteratur:Markus 16.
  • Head, Peter (2012): The Early Text of Mark, in: The Early Text of the New Testament (Hg. Charles E. Hill and Michael J. Kruger), Oxford 2012, 108-120.

Einleitung[Bearbeiten]

  • Guijarro, Santiago (2003): Why does the Gospel of Mark Begin as it Does?, in: Biblical Theology Bulletin 33, 28-38. (academia.edu)
    Abstract: Mark’s Gospel does not follow the rules of Hellenistic “lives”, which usually began by praising the ancestry and education of the main character. This is due to the fact that the data available to Mark were inappropriate for that purpose. Nonetheless, the beginning of Mark’s Gospel has the same purpose as the beginnings of other contemporary biographies: to show the ascribed honour of his character. According to Mark, Jesus’ honour does not come from his human family; it is due to his being God’s Son. Through a ritual process, centred upon a liminal stage of revelation and testing, the evangelist shows Jesus’ true identity as a holy man, capable of brokering God’s patronage on his people.
  • Hurtado, Larry (1989): Einleitung aus dem Kommentar Mark (Understanding the Bible Commentary Series)
  • Moloney, Francis J. (2012): Einleitung aus dem Kommentar The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary.

Sprache, Argumentation, Stil[Bearbeiten]

Novum Testamentum XXXI/3, 193-216.

Kommentare[Bearbeiten]

S.a. die Kommentar-Bibliographie.
  • DeWelt, Don / B. W. Johnson (1965): The Gospel of Mark (=Bible Study Textbook 27). Joplin.

Einzelstudien[Bearbeiten]

the Angels Waited on Him” (Mark 1:13): Hospitality and Discipleship in Mark’s Gospel], in: Conspectus 8/2009, 1-25 (academia.edu)

Sonstiges[Bearbeiten]

  • Vorlesungskript von Thomas Söding, 2011, 91 S. mit Bibliographie und Einleitung.